Upvoted: “The Supreme Court has explained that the Elections Clause also imposes implicit restrictions on the power to regulate congressional elections. Neither Congress NOR THE STATES may attempt to dictate electoral outcomes, or favor or disfavor certain classes of candidates. ” via /r/The_Donald

Posted on by


“The Supreme Court has explained that the Elections Clause also imposes implicit restrictions on the power to regulate congressional elections. Neither Congress NOR THE STATES may attempt to dictate electoral outcomes, or favor or disfavor certain classes of candidates. “

Does this mean WE have a Supreme Court case that our constitutional right to fair elections is impeded by states who make it easy to cheat in elections; i.e. vote harvesting, no voter I.D. laws, lax absentee balloting, mass mailing of absentee ballots, long periods of early voting, corrupt elections officials?

ref: https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretations/elections-clause-morley-tolson

Submitted July 26, 2019 at 12:05PM by thecricketsareloudin
via reddit http://bit.ly/32UN8ks

tagged with ,